"In the bottom of the fifth, according to multiple media reports, Orioles
play-by-play man Gary Thorne said on the air that he had been told by Red Sox
catcher Doug Mirabelli that the substance was paint, not blood."
REALLY?
I tend to think that it really was blood on Schillings sock, but just to be
sure I am calling for a full Congressional investigation, with a transcriber,
and under oath. Only then can we get to the bottom of Sockgate. Although since Schilling is a republican you can be sure that the administration will try to block his testimony.
*Don't forget to submit your answers to yesterday's poll*
2 comments:
I was watching the broadcast when the play-by-play guy said that. I was pretty shocked. I'm not sure what I think about the situation. I'll give 4-1 odds that the blood was real. Don't they have the sock somewhere? Cooperstown, probably? It seems like this would be an easy debate to settle with a little CSI action.
Yeah, it is in Cooperstown. Maybe a full DNA analysis is in order in concert with the congressional investigation. Who knows, we may even learn that Schilling is actually the father of Anna Nicole Smith's baby.
Post a Comment